广西省2023年八桂智学9月高三新高考联考英语试题查看答案正在持续更新，目前2025衡水金卷单元卷答案网为大家整理了相关试题及答案，供大家查缺补漏，高效提升成绩。

本文从以下几个角度介绍。

1、2024年高考广西八桂金卷第二次摸底考试
2、2024年高考广西八桂金卷联合模拟考试
3、2024高考广西八桂金卷答案
4、2023-2024八桂高考网
5、2023-2024广西八桂招生网
6、2023-2024广西八桂教育
7、2023-2024广西八校联考
8、2023-2024广西八桂智慧科技有限公司
9、2023-2024广西八桂智谷管理咨询有限公司
10、2023-2024广西八桂职业技能培训学校官网

9.What can a physical movement do?A.Increase blood flow.B.Increase the amount of blood sugar.C.Urge one to eat more.D.Make the brain tired.10.What does the underlined phrase "gorge on"in paragraph 5 mean?A.Eat.B.Purchase.C.Taste.D.Obtain.11.What do the researchers want to know from the study?A.Whether brain uses sugar and lactate as fuel.B.Whether brain can be tired during exercise.C.Whether exercise can reduce eating desire.D.Whether exercise increases blood sugar.【语篇导读】本文是一篇说明文。研究人员猜测，过多的思考会消耗大脑的大量能量，进而导致身体饥饿。由于大脑使用糖和乳酸盐作为燃料，研究人员想知道，在运动过程中增加的富含燃料的血液流量，是否能让疲惫的大脑得到补充，并减少暴饮暴食的冲动。8B细节理解题。根据第一段第二、三句可知，大脑过多的思考会让人感到饥饿。9,A细节理解题。根据第二段内容可知，身体运动能增加血液流动。l0.A词义猜测题。根据本段第一句Next,half the students sat quietly for 15 minutes,before being given pizza.及画线词句中的too可知，这些学生也可以吃披萨。根据画线词所在句后的But by and large,they did notovereat.也可得知，画线词意为“吃”。11.C推理判断题。根据第三段内容可知，研究人员想从这项研究中知道运动是否能降低食欲。We've all been there:Those times you need to argue your point of view to someone who you know disagreeswith you.You immediately go to your keyboard and start to type out that 280-character short message,the socialaccount reply,or a paragraphs-long e-mail.Surely the reason,logic,and strong power of your written words willconvince whoever it is who disagrees with you to see your point of view.But new research suggests these writtenarguments may not be the best approach.That research was conducted by Juliana Schroeder,assistant professor of University of California,Berkeley,and her colleagues.In Schroeder's study of almost 300 people,participants were asked to watch,listen,and readarguments about subjects they agreed or disagreed with.They were asked to judge the character of thecommunicator and the quality of the argument.Schroeder's team found that the participants who watched orlistened to the communicator were less dismissive (of their claims than when they read thatcommunicator's same argument.The idea for her study came from a newspaper article about a politician:One of us read a speech that wasprinted in a newspaper from a politician with whom he strongly disagreed.The next week,he heard the exactsame speech playing on a radio station.He was shocked by how different his reaction was toward the politicianwhen he read the speech compared to when he heard it.When he read the statement,the politician seemed idiotic,but when he heard it spoken,the politician actually sounded reasonable.So in the workplace,speaking to someone in person often involves nothing more than walking a few doorsdown to their office.And that's exactly what you should do if you need to convince that boss or colleague of whyyour blueprint for the company or project is the right one.Only as a last way should you try to communicate with someone who you disagree with over social media.Social media's limited text allowance and users'short attention make arguing your point an uphill()battle.·68·