炎德英才大联考·长沙市一中2024届高三月考试卷(二)2英语答案正在持续更新，目前2025衡水金卷单元卷答案网为大家整理了相关试题及答案，供大家查缺补漏，高效提升成绩。

The powerful AI clearly has the potential to squeeze more value out of human workers,but it may wellcome at the cost of our mental energy.However brilliant these models become,watch out for how theymight take you a tiny step closer to burnout.28.Which of the following is TRUE about AI-related tools?A.They are able to complete tasks without making errors.B.They're likely to assist human workers in increasing outputsC.They contribute to fostering positive relationship between colleaguesD.They can relieve human workers of pressure from demanding employers.29.According to the last two paragraphs,employees with frequent access to AI tend toA.get higher salaryB.suffer mental exhaustionC.enjoy more leisure timeD.cultivate strategic thinking30.What is author's attitude toward introducing AI to workplaces?A.Supportive.B.Tolerant.C.Concerned.D.Indifferent.31.What's the passage mainly about?A.AI like ChatGPT provides more freedom for human workers.B.The improvement in efficiency is largely attributed to AI like ChatGPT.C.The development of AI like ChatGPT poses negative impacts on humans.D.The disadvantages of AI like ChatGPT outweigh its advantages in the workplace.DPeople trained to detect lies often rely on multiple signs,such as eye contact,length of responses andthe details in what people say,but studies have shown that assessing a wide range of behaviouralinformation can make it harder to decide if someone is lying.Bruno Verschuere at the University ofAmsterdam and his colleagues wondered whether solely focusing on the detail of statements could providemore consistent results.To test this idea,researchers asked 44 students to go for a walk or steal from a mock crime.Students were instructed to lie if they committed the fake theft.Next,the researchers recruited 171 people to watch six truthful and six deceptive (interviewsfrom these recordings,ranking interviewees'eye contact and detail level.The results revealed that bothtruth-tellers and liars averted (their gaze a similar amount,but truthful statements were substantiallymore detailed than deceptive ones,suggesting the latter is a more useful way to tell that someone is lying.The researchers then asked 405 people to judge the true nature of six truthful and six deceptivestatements randomly chosen from the interviews.Around half of the participants used multiple cues toidentify liars.The remaining participants solely ranked the level of detail in answers on a scale of 1 to 10,with a 6 or above counting as truthful.Those using multiple cues distinguished lies from the truth 59%ofthe time,while those relying solely on detail achieved 66%."Our take is that using just one cue can provide a simpler way to judge lies from the truth,"saysVerschuere.Nevertheless,in the real world,you would probably need to confirm the accuracy of statementsthrough extra further investigations or follow-up questions,he says.32.Bruno Verschuere and his colleagues conducted the research to confirm thatA.behavioral information played a vital role in finding out the truthB.people should be trained to detect lies by referring to multiple cuesC.truthtellers and liars shared something in common when performing the taskD.it's relatively easier to identify liars by relying only on the detail of statements33.What can we learn from paragraph 3 and 4?A.Liars turned away their eyes more often than truth-tellers.B.Truthful statements included considerably more details than deceptive ones.浙江省重点中学拔尖学生培养联盟高三英语试题卷第5页共8页